As kingfishers catch fire, dragonflies dráw fláme; / As tumbled over rim in roundy wells / Stones ring; like each tucked string tells, each hung bell's / Bow swung finds tongue to fling out broad its name; / Each mortal thing does one thing and the same: / Deals out that being indoors each one dwells; / Selves -- goes itself; myself it speaks and spells, / Crying Whát I do is me: for that I came.// Í say móre: the just man justices/ [Gerard Manley Hopkins]

About Me

My photo
In "Four Cultures of the West," John O'Malley, SJ, showed us how to read the open book of our own personal experience and look at what we find there. This is what I find about family and friends, academics and humanism, religion and the rule of law.

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

The Butler Did It


By Richard Allen Greene and Hada Messia, CNN

Pope Benedict XVI's butler will be tried on an aggravated theft charge over the leaking of hundreds of secret papers from the pope's personal apartment to an Italian journalist, a Vatican spokesman said Monday.

The butler, Paolo Gabriele, acted out of a desire to combat "evil and corruption everywhere in the Church," according to a prosecutor in the case.

"I was certain that a shock ... would have been healthy to bring the church back onto the right track," the prosecutor, Nicola Piccardi, wrote in a report released Monday by the Vatican.

A second man, Vatican IT expert Claudio Sciarpelletti, will be charged with aiding Gabriele, according to the Rev. Federico Lombardi, a Vatican spokesman.

Sciarpelletti is not suspected of conspiring with Gabriele, merely assisting him, and is not under arrest, Lombardi said.

The investigation is continuing, said Lombardi, raising the possibility of more arrests.

The trials are not expected to start before September 20, Lombardi said.
Gabriele, one of the pope's closest personal assistants, was arrested in May on suspicion of passing the papers to an Italian journalist. He faces the possibility of one to six years behind bars, Lombardi said.
The scandal has rocked the Catholic Church hierarchy and could even affect who becomes the next pope.

It could be an effort to unseat Benedict's secretary of state, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, who will run the conclave to choose the next pope if he is in office when Benedict dies, according to the Rev. Thomas Reese, author of "Inside the Vatican."

Gabriele was held in a special Vatican cell for about a month and a half before being released to house arrest in July.

The Vatican said Gabriele cooperated with investigators and admits leaking the papers, which consisted of faxes, letters and memos, including some from a high-ranking church official expressing concerns about corruption within the Vatican.

The arrest followed a top-level Vatican investigation into how the private documents appeared in the best-selling book "Sua Santita" ("His Holiness") by Italian journalist Gianluigi Nuzzi.

The Vatican called the publication of his book "criminal" when it was released in Italian.

Copies of some documents used in the book were found in the butler's apartment, according to the judge's report released Monday.

Gabriele was not paid for handing over the papers, according to the judge, Piero Antonio Bonnet.

Cardinal Julian Herranz got a "pontifical mandate" in April to uncover the source of hundreds of personal letters and confidential documents that made their way to Nuzzi.

Nuzzi would not confirm the identity of his sources, but he told CNN that his primary source - whom he referred to as "Maria" in his book - "risked life and limb" if ever found out.

The source worked inside the Vatican, according to Nuzzi, who refused to give other details such as the source's gender, age and if he or she was clergy.

Nuzzi's book highlights an internal power struggle within the Vatican through numerous documents, including faxes, personal letters and inter-Vatican memos. He told CNN that he received the documents during a year of private meetings in secret locations.

The Vatican has not denied the authenticity of the documents but instead says the breach of privacy is a criminal act.

*****
Lordie, Lordie, Friends, can we believe this is happening?

The butler did it? Really?

Hidden incriminating papal documents? Aw, C’mon!

What a fascinating and intriguing church we may have after all!

And now I’m doing what lawyers unctuously remind friends never to do: gossiping about a news item of derring-do Inside the sacrosanct halls of papal apartments, thus rushing to judgment with a banner emblazoned “I Told You So!!!”, in finding guilty those we long suspected of devious conduct, ecclesially. 

And not necessarily the perp who sneaked out the documents in the first place. Our rushing .to judgment is to keep the heat on and foment the desire of law enforcement to dig deep and deeper, to drag out in the open all the machinators of dogma-disciplie-decree poured out for centuries as gowned men kept control with tight, soft hands, in sacred silence.

Little details whittle our bloodhound’s nose as we surf the web looking for more and more and more among the little details: like the butler giving copies to his maître d'hôtel – great proof of their existence? – only to watch them vanish as the trembling fellow burned them all – tampering with evidence? 

Glee rolls on with a hushed expectation that much more will be coming, because the Vatican boasts of an early trial in September, when all the evidence will be produced in open court. 

Hasn’t any attorney told the curial gang to hush, hush, while sniffing reporters go wild. Exposing Vatican secrecy may be too dangerous for such exposure, and we may yet hear that the trial will either be abandoned or conducted behind closed doors. 

The Vatican, though a State, can’t claim irremediable danger to national security, can it?

Matthew 27:51 tells us, “At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook and the rocks split.” 

So many people have waited for so many years for the curial curtain to be so “torn in two from top to bottom” that “The earth shook and the rocks split.” Such anticipation may soon be fulfilled when brilliant lighting strikes again in a place thought holy. Remnants and foundations of churchly buildings may become Roman ruins for tourists to haunt for centuries to come. 

      “Look, up there, third floor ruins on the far corner. Those are the papal apartments, where the butler          used to work….”

      “OMG,this was the most powerful church In the entire history of civilization. For thousands of years."

      “Say what you will, Buster. They ran a tight ship.”

      “Yup. And an insignificant butler, low down on the rank of house servants, pulled the plug and sank it.”

Some might compare misdemeanors of a papal butler as trivial as pouring blood on nuclear weapons. Makes one wonder whether such loyalists would have sided with the High Priests of Jerusalem’s Temple or the lightning bolt?

Makes one wonder about papal power and those who created and guarded it so.
_,___

Sunday, August 12, 2012


Vatican’s Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church

A copy of this document was enclosed in the Georgetown Faculty's letter to Congressman Paul Ryan


Paul Ryan and Catholic Social Doctrine

The Georgetown University Faculty Letter to
Paul Ryan About Catholic Social Doctrine
April, 2012
Dear Rep. Paul Ryan,

Welcome to Georgetown University. We appreciate your willingness to talk about how Catholic social teaching can help inform effective policy in dealing with the urgent challenges facing our country. As members of an academic community at a Catholic university, we see your visit on April 26 for the Whittington Lecture as an opportunity to discuss Catholic social teaching and its role in public policy.

However, we would be remiss in our duty to you and our students if we did not challenge your continuing misuse of Catholic teaching to defend a budget plan that decimates food programs for struggling families, radically weakens protections for the elderly and sick, and gives more tax breaks to the wealthiest few. As the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has wisely noted in several letters to Congress – “a just framework for future budgets cannot rely on disproportionate cuts in essential services to poor persons.” Catholic bishops recently wrote that “the House-passed budget resolution fails to meet these moral criteria.”

In short, your budget appears to reflect the values of your favorite philosopher, Ayn Rand, rather than the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Her call to selfishness and her antagonism toward religion are antithetical to the Gospel values of compassion and love.

Cuts to anti-hunger programs have devastating consequences. Last year, one in six Americans lived below the official poverty level and over 46 million Americans – almost half of them children – used food stamps for basic nutrition. We also know how cuts in Pell Grants will make it difficult for low-income students to pursue their educations at colleges across the nation, including Georgetown. At a time when charities are strained to the breaking point and local governments have a hard time paying for essential services, the federal government must not walk away from the most vulnerable.

While you often appeal to Catholic teaching on “subsidiarity” as a rationale for gutting government programs, you are profoundly misreading Church teaching. Subsidiarity is not a free pass to dismantle government programs and abandon the poor to their own devices. This often misused Catholic principle cuts both ways. It calls for solutions to be enacted as close to the level of local communities as possible. But it also demands that higher levels of government provide help -- “subsidium”-- when communities and local governments face problems beyond their means to address such as economic crises, high unemployment, endemic poverty and hunger. According to Pope Benedict XVI: "Subsidiarity must remain closely linked to the principle of solidarity and vice versa.”

Along with this letter, we have included a copy of the Vatican's Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, commissioned by John Paul II, to help deepen your understanding of Catholic social teaching.

Respectfully,

Thomas J. Reese, S.J.
Senior Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center

Maurice Jackson
Associate Professor of History and African American Studies
Department of History

Angelyn Mitchell, PhD
Associate Professor of English and African American Studies
Department of English

Dolores R. Leckey
Senior Research Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center

Raymond B. Kemp
Senior Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center

Thomas Michel, S.J., Ph.D.
Senior Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center

Rita M. Rodriguez, MBA, PhD
Senior Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center

Hope LeGro
Director, Georgetown Languages
Georgetown University Press

Jackie Beilhart
Publicist
Georgetown University Press

John Langan, S.J.
Professor of Philosophy and Catholic Social Thought
Georgetown University

John F Haught, PhD
Senior Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center

Karen Stohr, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Philosophy, Senior Research Scholar, Kennedy Institute of Ethics
Department of Philosophy

Ilia Delio, OSF
Senior Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center

Joseph Schad, Mdiv
Chaplain, Mission and Pastoral Care
Georgetown University Hospital

J. Leon Hooper, S.J.
Director, Woodstock Library
Woodstock Theological Center Library

Joseph A. McCartin
Associate Professor of History; Director, Kalmanovitz Initiative for Labor and the Working Poor
Department of History

E. Hazel Denton, PhD
Adjunct Professor
School of Nursing and Health Studies

James Walsh, SJ, Phd
Associate Professor
Department of Theology

Scott Taylor
Associate Professor
School of Foreign Service

Sarah C Stiles, PhD, JD
Professor
Department of Sociology

Katherine Marshall, MPA
Visiting Assistant Professor
Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs

William C. McFadden, S.J.
Associate Professor of Theology
Georgetown University

Alan C. Mitchell, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of New Testament and Christian Origins
Georgetown University

Rev. Dr. Joseph Palacios
Adjunct Professor of Latin American Studies
Center for Latin American Studies

Julia A Lamm
Associate Professor of Theology
Theology Department

Peter C. Phan, Ph.D., D.D.
Professor of Catholic Social Thought
Georgetown University

William Rehg, SJ, PhD, MDiv, PhL, MA
Professor of Philosophy
Saint Louis University (visiting, Georgetown University)

Diana L. Hayes, JD, PhD, STD
Professor Emerita of Systematic Theology
Georgetown University

Edward Vacek, S.J.
Visiting Scholar
Woodstock Theological Center

Anthony Tambasco, PhD
Professor of Biblical Studies and Christian Ethics
Theology Department

Mark Lance, PhD
Professor of Philosophy, Professor of Justice and Peace
Georgetown University

Robert J. Bies, PhD, MBA
Professor of Management
McDonough School of Management

Benjamin Bogin, PhD
Assistant Professor
Theology Department

John W. O'Malley, S.J., PhD
University Professor
Theology Department

Lauve H. Steenhuisen, PhD
Visiting Assistant Professor
Theology Department

Linda Ferneyhough
Theology Dept. Administrator
Theology Department

Marilyn McMorrow
Visiting Assistant Professor International Relations and Political Theory
School of Foreign Service

Matthew Carnes, S.J., PhD
Assistant Professor of Government
Georgetown University

Diana Owen, PhD
Associate Professor
CCT/American Studies

Friederike Eigler (Ph.D.)
Professor of German
Georgetown University College

Ricardo L. Ortiz, PhD
Associate Professor of English
Department of English

David J. Collins, S.J., S.T.L., Ph.D.
Associate Professor of History
Georgetown University

Peter C. Pfeiffer, PhD
Professor
German Department

Julie Finnegan Stoner
Publishing Assistant
Georgetown University Press

Mary Helen Dupree
Assistant Professor of German
Georgetown University

Lan Ngo, S.J., M.A., MDiv.
Graduate Student
Department of History

Francis J. Ambrosio PhD
Associate Professor of Philosohy
Philosophy Department

Joseph H. Neale, Ph.D.
Paduano Distinguished Professor of Biology
Georgetown University College

Elizabeth Velez
Academic Director, Community Scholars
Professorial Lecturer, English Women's and Gender Studies
Georgetown University College

Astrid Weigert
Assistant Professor of German
Department of German

John Rakestraw, PhD
Instructor of Theology
Center for New Designs in Learning & Scholarship

Susan F. Martin, PhD
Donald G. Herzberg Associate Professor of International Migration
School of Foreign Service

Eli S. McCarthy PhD
Adjunct Professor of Justice and Peace Studies
Center for Social Justice

Veronica Salles Reese
Associate Professor
Spanish Department

Francisca Cho, PhD
Professor of Buddhist Studies
Theology Department

Marcia Chatelain
Assistant Professor of History
Georgetown University

Heidi Byrnes, PhD
George M. Roth Distinguished Professor of German
German Department

Steven R. Sabat, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
College of Arts and Sciences

Marianne Lyons
Assistant Dean
School of Nursing & Health Studies

Ladan Eshkevari, PhD, CRNA
Assistant Professor
Georgetown University

John Kraemer, JD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Health Systems Administration
School of Nursing & Health Studies

Jose R Teruel, MD, MPH
Professor of International Health
School of Nursing and Health Studies

Elizabeth H. Andretta, Ph.D.
Visiting Associate Professsor
Georgetown University in Qatar

Jo Anne P Davis, PhD
Assistant Professor, Nursing
School of Nursing & Health Studies

Irene Anne Jillson, PhD
Assistant Professor
School of Nursing and Health Studies

Jeanne A. Matthews, PhD, RN
Chair and Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing
School of Nursing and Health Studies

Justin M. Owen, BSc(Eng)
Director of Medical Technologies
School of Nursing & Health Studies

Laura Anderko PhD RN
Scanlon Endowed Chair in Values Based Health Care
School of Nursing & Health Studies

Michael A. Stoto, PhD
Professor of Health Systems Administration and Population Health
School of Nursing & Health Studies and Pubic Policy Institute

Ronald Leow, Ph.D.
Professor of Applied Linguistics
Georgetown University

Rosemary Sokas, MD, MOH
Professor of Human Science
School of Nursing and Health Studies

Carol Taylor, PhD, RN
Professor of Nursing
School of Nursing and Health Studies

Robert J. Barnet MD, MA
Adjunct Professor of Medicine
School of Medicine

Leona M Fisher, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of English
Department of English

Jane Fitz-Simons MS,RN
Adjunct Faculty Nursing
Georgetown University

Mary Jane Mastorovich, MS
Asst. Professor, Health Systems Administration
Georgetown University

Edilma Yearwood, PhD, RN
Associate Professor of Nursing
School of Nursing & Health Studies

Wilfried Ver Eecke
Professor in Philosophy
Department of Philosophy

Sylvia E. Mullins, M.A.R in Theology
Graduate Student
Department of History

Terry Pinkard, PhD
University Professor
Department of Philosophy

Bryce Huebner, PhD
Assistant Professor of Philosophy
Georgetown University

Judith Baigis, PhD, RN, FAAN
Professor Emerita
School of Nursing & Health Studies

Patricia Mullahy Fugere
Adjunct Professor, JD Program
AB '81; JD '84; E.D., Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless

Henry Schwarz, PhD
Professor of English
Georgetown University

Judith Lichtenberg, PhD
Professor of Philosophy
Georgetown University

Joseph A. Chalmers, PhD
Retired Dean
Georgetown University

E. J. Dionne, Jr., D.Phil.
University Professor
Georgetown Public Policy Institute

Marlene Canlas, MA, MPH
Assistant Dean

Georgetown University


“A DIALOGUE OF THE DEAF”


Dreamer that I may be, the uplift in my soul kept saying that the LCWR and College of Cardinals could come to a reasonable, faith-filled discussion about the Church. Brickbat hurlers, who hone the edges of combat knives for religion-tinged disputations, are prone to repeat with gusto, “No!”

Men in ecclesial power tremble at the slightest sound of women’s feet on their glass ceiling. They have seen their brothers in the worlds of national government, international diplomacy, world-wide and local business, yield a little, groan a lot, as one woman after another demonstrates that women are the equals of men; quite often their superiors in leadership.

More devastating to those men of power, long gone rigid over two millennia of unbridled authority,  is the growing realization among ordinary people that in many regards, particularly leadership, women are superior to men.

Women are by nature kinder, more respectful of those with whom they may disagree, and always ready, willing and able to listen before speaking. We never hear them curse. Only on the rarest of provocations do they return demeaning insults with choice ones of their own.

An example from current news on reaction to the LCWR’s decision to continue dialogue helps make the point. Cardinal William Levada, former Dean of the CDF Dicastery, is known well for his heavy-voiced growlings in rhetorical put-downs of those unprivileged persons outside his College of Cardinals, -- a miniscule bunch of 181 men who appear to act as if they founded, then owned and thus rule the world.

Cardinal Levada denounced the current disputation-via-headlines between the CDF and the LCWR, as “a dialogue of the deaf.”

Sad. Not outrageous, but sad.

An hierarchical contrast makes the point. On August 5, the front page of The Seattle Times ran an article: “Low-Key archbishop in the spotlight” concerning Archbishop J. Peter Sartrain, one of Levada’s choices for the Triumvirate set up to reign in the LCWR. 

Fr. John Whitney, S.J. former provincial of the Oregon Province, spoke candidly there of Archbishop Sartrain “as accesible, & a good listener. He went on to say that the archbishop did not demean those who disagreed with him but that he was steadfast in his orthodoxy. Whitney conceded however, that Sartain was a lot nicer than others of his position."

Levada demeans.

Rather than continue his tone of talk, may I suggest we pray for Cardinal Levada and his cohorts to be gentlemen, as well as hierarchs. There is, so far, no sign of any need to ask the LCWR to be anything other than what they already are: servants of the people of God, equal with, if not superior to, the male hierarchy, another group within the Church also described as “servants of the people of God.”

Saturday, August 11, 2012

LCWR and ROME

LCWR stands for the Leadership Conference of Women Religious. Oddly there is no LCMR, probably because male celibate clerics rule the roost and proclaim that they, only they, can rise to leadership.
LCWR is meeting now to determine its response to Rome's stringent assessment of their place in the church. NCR has a couple of good articles, in case anyone hasn’t kept up with the details.
The temptation to respond to the episcopal triumvirate was so strong, I doubted whether I had any professional attitudes to those bishops at all. Sheer revulsion at their conduct, too easily branded as thuggery, forced me to shut up, be still, and support the Nuns and their leaders with prayer, filled with an equal amount of emotion on the good side. I had no contact with Nuns while growing up.
We went to Sunday School for Catechism lessons, until Dad, the Sexton of our parish church, heard my squeals at a couple of women wearing black who looked like and acted like thugines. Over the years I could never understand why a girl would want to be a Nun. So, for most of my life, I was just like a lot of men who protested they were good fellows, but still looked askance at women. For eight years I was a Jesuit, until I returned to ordinary life and practiced law, while helping the love of my life raise a family of four sons.
Thank goodness that youthful attitude has vanished, mostly because of 53 years of daily living with a lovable, loving woman and getting to know her friends on a much better level than distant politeness. I saw quickly how lawyers could never succeed at anything without the help of women, not just as secretaries or paralegals, but as equally competent, skilled, and prepared lawyers. Women took their places as judges in trial courts and justices in appellate courts, with as much skill, patience, learning, and ability to judge as are their fellow men judges. Glance, if you will, at halls of Government, Universities, Professional Graduate Schools, Corporations, Partnerships, yes, even the Military, where women are as equal, if not superior, to men. Watch TV these days to see Olympic athletes from countries all over the world.
What, in God’s Name, is wrong with the Catholic Church in its attitude towards its own women, particularly our Nuns?
Perhaps, should the bishops have more daily contact with Nuns, in the service of the people of God, they’d change their attitudes, too. I guess that means prayers for them to wake up, look and see what the Church has in the Sisterhood. And get along, together, as do we, men and women in our daily lives. When I think of Mother, Wife, Aunt, Cousin in my own family, or of Sister, Daughter in other families, I cannot understand the lack of understanding male celibate clerics have about women in the Church.
It is senseless. Worse than that, it is cruel. There are so many other adjectives to describe the indescribable contempt professional churchmen have towards women. Each one of those male hierarchs had a mother. Many had sisters within the family. Others might even have been in love, prior to entering the seminary. Even afterwards, as well.
And yet ….. and yet . . .

Gotta Keep 'Em Outa Equality

The voices of many Catholic men are tinged with a sense of fairness. It is hard to see such fairness, though, when they are so standoffishly aloof about celibate males, pricky or prickless as they may be, about looking up to women, through or around them.
What if they were to hold hands with a bunch of Nuns, try a folk dance in an old barn out in Rome’s suburbs, go one on one with one at a time for lunch, stroll a walk through the Vatican State, fiddle a game of checkers? What if, even when it cannot be imagined?
While working a lifetime in an office, I noted that bachelors had a tough time getting along with women on a casual basis. They either wanted to avoid them or bed them, once, perhaps twice, just to get the feel of what closeness was actually like. Gosh, just look at our poor fellows’ education, how we grew up. I never saw a girl or a woman in the classrooms of high school. Not until college in 1945, and then, they weren’t the cute and perky type at all, but Mother Superior wannabes out to give guys a rough one on one to see who would dance on the glass ceiling. Come to think of it, none of them played football, baseball, ice hockey, or God forbid wrestling in high school or college.In our befuddled youth, sports were similar to the halls of leadership.in the Church. For Men Only. We were it, but we liked girls.
What would ever happen were a bishop to ask an LWCR stalwart, “Come, dance with me.” Touch would be involved, and touch has a way of opening doors, cleaning window panes, shopping for groceries, laughing together at reruns of “I Love Lucy” rather than “Father Knows Best.” While in conference with other women bishops, how many bishops would drop habitual superiority in “Get me a coffee, please?”
When men admit that women are, in fact, superior human beings to their complacency of who’s got it and who hasn’t, then men and women can no longer claim equality. Women are superior. Such an outlandish inner knowledge is perhaps so alien to male mentalities that women are doomed to being accepted only for procreation and service to men. Proof? How often are we surprised, even astonished, when a woman succeeds in surpassing us in skills, maturity, good looks, and common sense?
Nuns are more than housemaids, washerwomen, dainty icons prettifying a male world. They is us, better than us, as good as us, and both of us know it darn well. The deepest masculine fear strikes when a woman gets her foot up on a glass ceiling, alone or holding hands with her sisters, and starts to walk around, realizing fjull well that she belongs. That ceiling has to crack, shatter, break open and the whole structure men have built will all fall down.
Litle wonder that men have a secret motto mumbling: Gotta keep them outa equality, not just outa power.

Friday, August 3, 2012

Preachers Preach

Story? Famous preacher. Big city parish. Old Monsignor seated on throne of honor at the altar.Preacher enters by side door, erect, tall, clad in flowing black, biretta straight on, cape just so. He strides, not walks, to the foot of the altar, bows, not genuflects, turns towards the pulpit on high. And if imagination could dare say it was true, prances towards its flight of steps. He mounts them, as if in an ascension of his own. At the top, in the hushed silence generated in awe at such an ntrance, hspreads his arms out wide and straight, fingertips of each hand holding that magic cape out like ntwings, and silently counts his breaths all the way from one to twenty.

He begins, a modulated voice, strong, far reaching, pulsing with authority, quite softly, very slowly, inviting all to enter closer with his arms beckoning them to rise and sidle forward. Preacher speaks, “For my topic this evening, I have chosen the Gospel story of the man who fell through the roof. There are three magnificent moments in this story.” And he goes through the first two, noticing easily that his audience is enraptured, almost as much as he.

He resumes, “And now, dearly beloved in Christ, let us approach the third, the most daring, the most courageous, obviously, very obviously, the greatest story of all three….” He pauses, looks up at his right hand raised on high ready to descend like a lightning bolt, turns his face and eyes in a semicircular embrace of everyone in the church, and opens that mouth which always enchanteth all.

And silence oozes forth. Silence. Not a word. Not a single word. The arm flutters down. The face blanches grey. The cape droops in wrinkles. The entire body shudders. Tall preacher shrinks to normal size, humbles down the flight of stairs, shuffles to the altar’s foot, bows, then falls to his knees, hands clenched in puny prayer, as he tumbles forward, prone, the first time since his ordination to the priesthood some 25 years earlier.A few moments later, he struggles to his feet and turns to walk off to that side door, with a little kid’s glance at the Monsignor still seated in the chair of honor.

The Monsignor rises, holds out his arms for the welcome of humility, and says, while blessing the preachless one, “Father dear, had ye gone oop the way ye coom down, ye wooda coom down the way the way ye wint oop.”